• Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi · Jan 2019

    Comparative Study

    [Actual status of children with food allergies and food provision at residential nurseries and children's care homes: Comparison of groups using and not using guidelines or manuals].

    • Hisae Mori and Kenji Kuroda.
    • Osaka Yuhigaokagakuen College.
    • Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2019 Jan 1; 66 (3): 138-150.

    AbstractObjectives To elucidate the actual status of children with food allergies and the measures of allergy-appropriate food provisions at residential nurseries and children's care homes. We also compared institutions that used guidelines, manuals, etc. with those that did not.Methods Self-administered questionnaires were administered to residential nurseries and children's care homes in Japan. Responses were received from 394 institutions, yielding a response rate of 53.6%. The prevalence of food allergies was assessed in 392 institutions. To investigate the relationship between using guidelines and the status of the children, the analysis included 230 institutions where there were children with food allergies. The relationships between the presence or absence of guidelines and (i) occurrence or non-occurrence of anaphylactic shock or other allergy-related events and (ii) each step of food service were evaluated.Results The prevalence of food allergies at the 392 institutions was found to be 3.31%. It was difficult to obtain information concerning food allergies at admission to the institutions because a high proportion of children were reported as "children with no physician's diagnostic record," "children admitted without confirmation of allergy information," or "children with discrepancies between the information at admission and actual state." Of the 230 institutions studied, guidelines were followed at 25.0% of the institutions. Even when institutions with other written rules were included, this proportion only increased to 32.1%. The statistical analysis involved adjustments for different types of institutions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio for institutions where treatment was based on guidelines were significant for the following items: children with no physician's diagnostic record (0.35), existence of a consistent documentation method for collection of information (5.04), regular revisions of information being made (2.85), and reports being submitted when mistakes in food provided to children with allergies were made or narrowly avoided (2.49). In addition, strong correlations were found for the following: children who experienced anaphylactic shock during the previous 3 years (9.72) and children admitted without confirmation of a food allergy (3.12).Conclusions When rule-based approaches were established, the preparation of information collection forms, revision of information, and reporting of food provision mistakes proceeded more efficiently than when rule-based approaches were not used. Although the prevalence of children experiencing anaphylactic shock and the cases in which information was not confirmed at admission were higher in the institutions using guidelines, this survey revealed that when guidelines were followed, appropriate measures were taken after the admission of children to the institution and that physicians' medical diagnoses were obtained.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…