• Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi · Apr 2019

    [Effectiveness analysis of modified tarsal sinus approach for Sanders Ⅱ- Ⅲtype calcaneal fractures].

    • Kaibin Fang, Qingfeng Ke, Shiqiang Wu, Liquan Cai, and Xiaolu Zhang.
    • Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou Fujian, 362000, P.R.China.
    • Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 15; 33 (4): 462-466.

    ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of modified tarsal sinus approach and traditional tarsal sinus approach in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures.MethodsBetween January 2015 and August 2017, 53 patients with Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures were selected and divided into observation group (21 cases, using modified tarsal sinus approach for fracture reduction after exposure of the subtalar joint below the long and short fibular tendon) and control group (32 cases, using traditional tarsal sinus approach) by random number method. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, side, cause of injury, fracture type, injury to operation time, and preoperative Böhler angle, Gissane angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) core ( P>0.05), which were comparable. The operation time, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and postoperative angle improvement values of the two groups were recorded and compared. VAS score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.ResultsAll the 53 patients successfully completed the operation without serious complications such as vascular and nerve injury and perioperative death. There was no significant difference in operation time and postoperative drainage volume between the two groups ( P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 17 months). No infection, fracture displacement, failure of internal fixation, and malunion of fracture occurred after operation. None of the patients underwent secondary joint fusion. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( t=0.30, P=0.77). The postoperative Böhler angle and Gissane angle at 2 days in the two groups were significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and improvement value between the observation group and the control group at 2 days after operation ( P>0.05). VAS scores at 24 hours and 1 year after operation were significantly improved when compared with that before operation in both groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at 24 hours and 1 year after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in AOFAS scores between the two groups at 1 year after operation ( t=1.46, P=0.15). However, the SF-36 scale score at 1 year after operation was significantly higher than that of the control group ( t=2.08, P=0.04). At last follow-up, 2 patients in the observation group and 8 patients in the control group presented subtalar joint stiffness or pain, and there was no significant difference in the incidence between the two groups ( χ2=1.98, P=0.16).ConclusionThe modified tarsal sinus approach for the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures has the advantages of minimal invasion, clear reduction under direct vision, reliable reduction and fixation, and low incision complications.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…