• NishiShawn P ESPEDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Galveston, TX; Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Galveston, TX. Electronic address: spnishi@utmb.edu., Jie Zhou, Ikenna Okereke, Yong-Fang Kuo, and James Goodwin.
• Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Galveston, TX; Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Galveston, TX. Electronic address: spnishi@utmb.edu.
• Chest. 2020 Feb 1; 157 (2): 427434427-434.

BackgroundClinical trials have demonstrated a mortality benefit from lung cancer screening by low-dose CT (LDCT) in current or past tobacco smokers who meet criteria. Potential harms of screening mostly relate to downstream evaluation of abnormal screens. Few data exist on the rates outside of clinical trials of imaging and diagnostic procedures following screening LDCT. We describe rates in the community setting of follow-up imaging and diagnostic procedures after screening LDCT.MethodsWe used Clinformatics Data Mart national database to identify enrollees age 55 to 80 year who underwent screening LDCT from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. We assessed rates of follow-up imaging (diagnostic chest CT scan, MRI, and PET) and follow-up procedures (bronchoscopy, percutaneous biopsy, thoracotomy, mediastinoscopy, and thoracoscopy) in the 12 months following LDCT for lung cancer screening. We also assessed these rates in an age-, sex-, and number of comorbidities-matched population that did not undergo LDCT to estimate rates unrelated to the screening LDCT. We then reported the adjusted rate of follow-up testing as the observed rate in the screening LDCT population minus the rate in the non-LDCT population.ResultsAmong 11,520 enrollees aged 55 to 80 years who underwent LDCT in 2016, the adjusted rates of follow up 12 months after LDCT examinations were low (17.7% for imaging and 3.1% for procedures). Among procedures, the adjusted rates were 2.0% for bronchoscopy, 1.3% for percutaneous biopsy, 0.9% for thoracoscopy, 0.2% for mediastinoscopy, and 0.4% for thoracotomy. Adjusted rates of follow-up procedures were higher in enrollees undergoing an initial screening LDCT (3.3%) than in those after a second screening examination (2.2%).ConclusionsIn general, imaging and rates of procedures after screening LDCT was low in this commercially insured population.Copyright © 2019 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

44 keywords...

hide…