• Richard G Weleber, Mark E Pennesi, David J Wilson, Shalesh Kaushal, Laura R Erker, Lauren Jensen, Maureen T McBride, Terence R Flotte, Margaret Humphries, Roberto Calcedo, William W Hauswirth, Jeffrey D Chulay, and J Timothy Stout.
• Casey Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: weleberr@ohsu.edu.
• Ophthalmology. 2016 Jul 1; 123 (7): 1606-20.

PurposeTo provide an initial assessment of the safety of a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector expressing RPE65 (rAAV2-CB-hRPE65) in adults and children with retinal degeneration caused by RPE65 mutations.DesignNonrandomized, multicenter clinical trial.ParticipantsEight adults and 4 children, 6 to 39 years of age, with Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) or severe early-childhood-onset retinal degeneration (SECORD).MethodsPatients received a subretinal injection of rAAV2-CB-hRPE65 in the poorer-seeing eye, at either of 2 dose levels, and were followed up for 2 years after treatment.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary safety measures were ocular and nonocular adverse events. Exploratory efficacy measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), static perimetry central 30° visual field hill of vision (V30) and total visual field hill of vision (VTOT), kinetic perimetry visual field area, and responses to a quality-of-life questionnaire.ResultsAll patients tolerated subretinal injections and there were no treatment-related serious adverse events. Common adverse events were those associated with the surgical procedure and included subconjunctival hemorrhage in 8 patients and ocular hyperemia in 5 patients. In the treated eye, BCVA increased in 5 patients, V30 increased in 6 patients, VTOT increased in 5 patients, and kinetic visual field area improved in 3 patients. One subject showed a decrease in BCVA and 2 patients showed a decrease in kinetic visual field area.ConclusionsTreatment with rAAV2-CB-hRPE65 was not associated with serious adverse events, and improvement in 1 or more measures of visual function was observed in 9 of 12 patients. The greatest improvements in visual acuity were observed in younger patients with better baseline visual acuity. Evaluation of more patients and a longer duration of follow-up will be needed to determine the rate of uncommon or rare side effects or safety concerns.Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

28 keywords...

hide…