• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Jan 2000

    Comparative Study

    Diagnostic and therapeutic management of lumbar and thoracic spondylodiscitis--an evaluation of 59 cases.

    • D C Wirtz, I Genius, J E Wildberger, G Adam, K W Zilkens, and F U Niethard.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Technology RWTH Aachen, Germany.
    • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000 Jan 1; 120 (5-6): 245-51.

    AbstractFifty-nine patients with spondylodiscitis (SD) of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine were followed-up clinically and radiologically [X-ray, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] over a mean time of 2.2 years (1-6.5 years). All patients without abscess formation (n = 35) were treated conservatively. Out of the group with abscess formation (n = 24) 6 patients were also treated conservatively, 11 were drained under CT control and 7 were operated. At time of diagnosis, "signs of florid inflammation" were seen in 60% of the roentgenograms, in 93% of the CTs and in all of the MRls. The sensitivity to differentiate between SD with and without abscess formation was 85% by MRI and 69% by CT. "Signs of regressive inflammation" and "signs of increasing osseous consolidation", essential facts for starting remobilization, could first be seen using CT 6 weeks after onset of therapy. Using MRI these signs were seen with a considerable delay at 12 weeks. Clinically, only 3 of the 59 analyzed patients developed recurrent SD. In conclusion, MRI is the radiological method of choice for establishing the diagnosis of SD, in particular with regard to differentiating between cases with and without abscess formations. In contrast, CT is superior for performing success control after treatment. Therapeutically, conservative, minimal-invasive and operative procedures are not rival but rather complementary.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…