Some functional parameters of the hip-joint 3.3 years on average (range 2-8.6 years) after hip arthroplasty are compared with regard to two types of hip endoprostheses: the total (TEP) and the bipolar (BPEP). Flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, and internal and external rotation were measured for 75 patients with BPEP type Self-Locking, for 11 patients with BPEP type Vario-Cup, and for 43 with TEP type Lubinus. ⋯ It was found that flexion, abduction and adduction were significantly higher in the BPEP endoprosthesis (P < 0.05). The results obtained are favourable for the bipolar hip endoprosthesis, and they can be related to the biomechanical differences between both types of hip endoprosthesis.
Department of Traumatology, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia. smrke@mf.uni-lj.si
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000 Jan 1; 120 (5-6): 259-61.
AbstractSome functional parameters of the hip-joint 3.3 years on average (range 2-8.6 years) after hip arthroplasty are compared with regard to two types of hip endoprostheses: the total (TEP) and the bipolar (BPEP). Flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, and internal and external rotation were measured for 75 patients with BPEP type Self-Locking, for 11 patients with BPEP type Vario-Cup, and for 43 with TEP type Lubinus. One-way analysis of variance with respect to co-variances was used for statistical testing of the measured data. It was found that flexion, abduction and adduction were significantly higher in the BPEP endoprosthesis (P < 0.05). The results obtained are favourable for the bipolar hip endoprosthesis, and they can be related to the biomechanical differences between both types of hip endoprosthesis.