• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Nov 2002

    Reliability of the two-minute walk test in individuals with transtibial amputation.

    • Dina Brooks, Judith P Hunter, Janet Parsons, Emma Livsey, Janice Quirt, and Michael Devlin.
    • Clinical Evaluation and Research Unit, West Park Healthcare Centre, 82 Buttonwood Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M6M 2J5, Canada. dina.brooks@utoronto.ca
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Nov 1; 83 (11): 1562-5.

    ObjectiveTo determine inter- and intrarater reliability of the two-minute walk test (2MWT) in individuals with transtibial amputation.DesignProspective; test-retest method by a pair of trained physical therapists.SettingTwo regional amputee rehabilitation centers in Canada.ParticipantsThirty-three subjects (23 men, 10 women; mean age +/- standard error, 63.6+/-2.0y) with transtibial amputation; 6 in outpatient rehabilitation, 27 in inpatient rehabilitation. The most common primary diagnoses were peripheral vascular disease (n=15) and diabetes (n=11).InterventionsEach subject performed a total of four 2MWTs, 1 test for each rater, on 2 consecutive days at approximately the same time of day. Subjects were given at least a 20-minute rest between tests. The order of raters was randomized on the first day and reversed for the next day. The walk tests were performed in the same enclosed corridors with the same starting point for all tests. The subjects were familiar with the test or were given 1 or more practice tests at least 1 day before testing. Subjects were allowed to walk with a mobility aid of their choice. Raters used a digital stopwatch to time the tests and a calibrated wheel with a counter to measure the distance walked in meters. The raters were blinded to each other's scores.Main Outcome MeasureDistance walked in 2 minutes (in meters).ResultsWithin-rater reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC],.90-.96). Between rater reliability was also high (ICC.98-.99). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant effect for day of test (P<.001) in the inpatient group but no effect for therapist (P=.098) or for interaction of day and therapist (P=.710). Similarly, in the outpatient group, ANOVA showed a significant effect for day (P=.013) but no effect for therapist (P=.259) or interaction of day and therapist (P=.923).ConclusionAlthough the 2MWT showed evidence of inter- and intrarater reliability in individuals with unilateral below-knee amputation, the distance walked in 2 minutes continued to improve over time. This improvement was not solely the result of a training and learning effect.Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.