• World Neurosurg · Jan 2020

    Multicenter Study

    Risks and benefits of glioblastoma resection in the elderly - a retrospective Austrian multi-center study.

    • Christoph Schwartz, Alexander Romagna, Harald Stefanits, Georg Zimmermann, Barbara Ladisich, Philipp Geiger, Julian Rechberger, Sophie Winkler, Lukas Weiss, Gerd Fastner, Eugen Trinka, Serge Weis, Sabine Spiegl-Kreinecker, Jürgen Steinbacher, Mark McCoy, Trenkler Johannes, Andreas Gruber, Rezai Jahromi Behnam B Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland., Mika Niemelä, Peter A Winkler, and Niklas Thon.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. Electronic address: c.schwartz@salk.at.
    • World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 1; 133: e583-e591.

    ObjectiveTo assess the prognostic profile, clinical outcome, treatment-associated morbidity, and treatment burden of elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM) undergoing microsurgical tumor resection as part of contemporary treatment algorithms.MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with GBM ≥65 years of age who were treated by resection at 2 neuro-oncology centers. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses; log-rank tests identified prognostic factors.ResultsThe study population included 160 patients (mean age, 73.1 ± 5.1 years), and the median contrast-enhancing tumor volume was 31.0 cm3. Biomarker analyses revealed O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-promoter methylation in 62.7% and wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase in 97.5% of tumors. The median extent of resection (EOR) was 92.3%, surgical complications were noted in 10.0% of patients, and the median postoperative hospitalization period was 8 days. Most patients (60.0%) received adjuvant radio-/chemotherapy. The overall treatment-associated morbidity was 30.6%. The median progression-free and overall survival were 5.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-6.4 months) and 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.9-11.7 months). The strongest predictors for favorable outcome were patient age ≤73.0 years (P = 0.0083), preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status Scale score ≥80% (P = 0.0179), postoperative modified Rankin Scale score ≤1 (P < 0.0001), adjuvant treatment (P < 0.0001), and no treatment-associated morbidity (P = 0.0478). Increased EOR did not correlate with survival (P = 0.5046), but correlated significantly with treatment-associated morbidity (P = 0.0031).ConclusionsClinical outcome for elderly patients with GBM remains limited. Nonetheless, the observed treatment-associated morbidity and treatment burden were moderate in the patients, and patient age and performance status remained the strongest predictors for survival. The risks and benefits of tumor resection in the age of biomarker-adjusted treatment concepts require further prospective evaluation.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…