• Philipp Forkel, Lucca Lacheta, Constantin von Deimling, Jan Lang, Louis Buchmann, Andreas B Imhoff, Rainer Burgkart, and Lukas Willinger.
• Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. philipp.forkel@tum.de.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jan 1; 140 (1): 59-65.

PurposeDisplaced tibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures require surgical fixation in order to provide an adequate bone healing and to avoid a loss of posterior stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a recently established modified suture bridge technique to a well-established transtibial pullout technique. It was hypothesized that the suture bridge technique shows lower elongation and higher load to failure force compared to a transtibial pullout fixation.MethodsTwelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were biomechanically tested using an uniaxial hydrodynamic material testing system. A standardized bony avulsion fracture of the tibial PCL insertion was generated. Two different techniques were used for fixation: (A) suture bridge configuration and (B) transtibial pullout fixation. In 90° of flexion elongation, initial stiffness and failure load were determined.ResultsThe suture-bridge technique resulted in a significant lower elongation (4.5 ± 2.1 mm) than transtibial pullout technique (12.4 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001). The initial stiffness at the beginning of cyclic loading was 46.9 ± 3.9 N/mm in group A und 40.8 ± 9.0 N/mm in group B (p = 0.194). Load to failure testing exhibited 286.8 ± 88.3 N in group A and 234.3 ± 96.8 N in group B (p = 0.377).ConclusionThe suture bridge technique provides a significant lower construct elongation during cyclic loading. But postoperative rehabilitation must respect the low construct strength of both techniques because both fixation techniques did not show a sufficient fixation strength to allow for a more aggressive rehabilitation.

19 keywords...

hide…