• Pediatr Crit Care Me · Jan 2020

    Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy After Cardiothoracic Surgery in Children Less Than 2 Months Old: An Assessment of Long-Term Malnutrition Status and Gastrostomy Outcomes.

    • Anthony A Sochet, Anna K Grindy, Sorany Son, Eddie K Barrie, Rhiannon L Hickok, Thomas A Nakagawa, and Michael J Wilsey.
    • Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, FL.
    • Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2020 Jan 1; 21 (1): 50-58.

    ObjectivesInfants with critical congenital heart disease undergoing cardiothoracic surgery commonly experience chronic malnutrition and growth failure. We sought to determine whether placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was associated with reduced moderate-severe malnutrition status and to describe percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-related clinical and safety outcomes in this population.DesignSingle-center, retrospective cohort study.SettingTwo hundred fifty-nine-bed, tertiary care, pediatric referral center.PatientsChildren with congenital heart disease less than 2 months old undergoing cardiothoracic surgery from 2007 to 2013 with and without percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsPrimary outcomes were weight for age z scores during hospitalization, at 6 months, and 1 year after cardiothoracic surgery. Secondary outcomes were frequency of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy revision, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complications, and mortality. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher exact, and Student t tests. Two hundred twenty-two subjects met study criteria, and 77 (35%) had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placed at a mean of 45 ± 31 days after cardiothoracic surgery. No differences were noted for demographics, comorbidities, and weight for age z score at birth and at the time of cardiothoracic surgery. The percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy cohort had greater Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery risk category (4 [4-5] vs 4 [2-4]) and length of stay (71 d [49-101 d] vs 26 d [15-42 d]). Mean weight for age z score at the time of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was -2.8 ± 1.3. Frequency of moderate-severe malnutrition (weight for age z score, ≤ -2) was greater in children with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at discharge (78% vs 48%), 6 months (61% vs 16%), and 1 year (41% vs 2%). Index mortality was lower in children with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at 30 days (8% vs 0%) and hospital discharge (19% vs 4%). However, no mortality differences were observed after discharge. Growth velocity after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was greater (44 ± 19 vs 10 ± 9 g/d). Children tolerated percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy without hemodynamic compromise, minor percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complications, and anticipated percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy revisions. Children without mortality had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy removal at a median duration of 253 days (133-545 d). Children with univentricular physiology had improved in-hospital mean growth velocity (6.3 vs 24.4 g/d; p < 0.01) and reduced 1-year rate moderate-severe malnutrition (66.7% vs 36.9%; p < 0.01) after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.ConclusionsPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement was well tolerated and associated with improved postoperative growth velocity in children with critical congenital heart disease undergoing cardiothoracic surgery less than 2 months old. These findings were also noted in our subanalysis of children with univentricular physiology. Persistent rates of moderate-severe malnutrition were noted at 1-year follow-up. Although potential index mortality benefit was observed, definitive data are still needed.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…