• J. Heart Lung Transplant. · May 2000

    Comparative Study

    Does human leukocyte antigen matching influence the outcome of lung transplantation? An analysis of 3,549 lung transplantations.

    • M A Quantz, L E Bennett, D M Meyer, and R J Novick.
    • London Health Sciences Centre and the University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. maquantz@julian.uwo.ca
    • J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2000 May 1; 19 (5): 473-9.

    Background And ObjectiveHuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has been shown to improve the outcome of renal and cardiac transplantation. However, its impact on outcome following lung transplantation is not clear, with several single-center studies reporting inconsistent results. We studied the influence of HLA matching on survival and the development of rejection and obliterative bronchiolitis after lung transplantation, using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing/International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry.MethodsThe study population included adult patients who received cadaveric lung transplants between October 1987 and June 1997 for whom HLA data were available. Two cohorts were examined, depending on the era of transplantation: (1) October 1987 to June 1997 (n = 3,549): Differences in actuarial survival as stratified by either the total number of HLA mismatches or the number of mismatches at each HLA locus were determined using a log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to determine independent predictors of survival at 1, 3, and 5 years following lung transplantation. (2) April 1994 to June 1997 (n = 1,796): The association of HLA mismatching with acute rejection and obliterative bronchiolitis was determined using a chi-squared analysis.ResultsOnly 164 patients (4.6%) received lung grafts with 2 or fewer HLA mismatches. Univariate analyses demonstrated a significant difference in post-transplant survival by mismatch level, with the total number of HLA mismatches (p = 0.0008) and mismatching at the HLA-A locus (p = 0.002) associated with worse survival. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the number of mismatches at the HLA-A and HLA-DR loci predicted 1-year mortality (incremental odds ratios 1.18, p = 0.01, and 1.15, p = 0. 03, respectively). The total number of HLA mismatches predicted 3- and 5-year mortality (incremental odds ratios 1.13 at 3 years, p = 0. 0004, and 1.14 at 5 years, p = 0.0002). However, other covariates such as repeat transplantation, transplantation for congenital heart disease, advanced recipient age, and an early era of transplantation were stronger predictors of mortality. We found no significant association between HLA mismatching and the development of obliterative bronchiolitis, although there was an association between mismatching at the HLA-A locus and acute rejection episodes requiring hospital admission (p = 0.008). We also found no association between mismatching at the HLA-B locus and rejection episodes requiring either hospitalization or the alteration of anti-rejection medications (p = 0.034).ConclusionAlthough the number of HLA mismatches at the HLA-A and HLA-DR loci predicted 1-year mortality and the total number of mismatches predicted 3- and 5-year mortality following lung transplantation, the effect of each covariate was small in this multicenter study of 3,549 patients. Further close follow-up of registry patients is necessary to determine the effect of HLA matching on long-term survival and freedom from obliterative bronchiolitis and rejection following lung transplantation. A prospective study of HLA matching for lung transplantation should not yet be considered in view of the small number of grafts with 2 or fewer mismatches and the modest effect of HLA matching on outcome.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.