• Camille Vanderclausen, Louise Manfron, Anne De Volder, and Valéry Legrain.
• Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
• Pain. 2020 Feb 1; 161 (2): 328-337.

AbstractLocalizing pain is crucial because it allows for detecting which part of the body is being hurt and identifying in its surrounding which stimulus is producing the damage. Nociceptive inputs should therefore be mapped according to somatotopic ("which limb is stimulated?") and spatiotopic representations ("where is the stimulated limb?"). Because the body posture constantly changes, the brain has to realign the different spatial representations, for instance when the arms are crossed with the left hand in the right space and vice versa, to adequately guide actions towards the threatening object. Such ability is thought to be dependent on past sensory experience and contextual factors. We compared performances of early blind and normally sighted participants during temporal order judgement tasks. Two nociceptive stimuli were applied, one on each hand, with the hands either uncrossed or crossed. Participants reported which stimulus they perceived as first presented, according to either its location on the body or the position of the stimulated hand, respectively, prioritizing anatomy or external space as task-relevant reference frame. Relative to the uncrossed posture, sighted participants' performances were decreased when the hands were crossed, whatever the instruction be. Early blind participants' performances were affected by crossing the hands during spatial instruction, but not during anatomical instruction. These results indicate that nociceptive stimuli are automatically coded according to both somatotopic and spatiotopic representations, but the integration of the different spatial reference frames depends on early visual experience and ongoing cognitive goals, illustrating the plasticity and the flexibility of the nociceptive system.

23 keywords...

hide…