• Hannah Rachel Bussell, Christoph Alexander Aufdenblatten, Corina Gruenenfelder, Stefan Altermatt, and Sasha Job Tharakan.
• Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Steinwiessstrasse 75, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland. hannah.bussell@kispi.uzh.ch.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Oct 1; 45 (5): 809-814.

PurposeNo clear consensus on the optimal treatment of fasciotomy wounds due to acute compartment syndrome of the lower leg in children exists. We therefore compared two commonly used methods to close fasciotomy wounds, Epigard, a temporary synthetic skin replacement (SSR) and the vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) device, in respect of treatment duration and complication rates.MethodsWe studied the cases of 27 patients who were treated at our institution for acute compartment syndrome of the lower leg with a fasciotomy over a 10-year period. The fasciotomy wound was either treated with SSR or V.A.C. device. We recorded the number of procedures to definitive wound closure, days to wound closure, hospitalization days and sequelae rate.ResultsIn the V.A.C. device group (18 patients) the mean number of procedures until definitive wound closure was 3.1, mean days until wound closure was 9.4 and mean days of hospitalization was 16.2. One patient suffered from a wound infection and one patient required a full thickness skin graft. In the SSR group (9 patients), the mean number of procedures was 1.8, mean days until definitive wound closure was 4.9 and mean days of hospitalization was 9.9. No sequelae were recorded. There was a statistically significant smaller number of procedures (p value 0.018), fewer days to definitive wound closure (p value 0.002) and fewer hospitalization days (p value 0.005) in the SSR group.ConclusionsBoth SSR and V.A.C. device are safe and reliable for closure of fasciotomy wounds in children, whereas SSR seems to lead to shorter time until definitive wound closure.

22 keywords...

hide…