• Munetaka Hirose, Yoshiko Kobayashi, Shiro Nakamoto, Ryusuke Ueki, Nobutaka Kariya, and Tsuneo Tatara.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
• Med. Sci. Monit. 2018 May 20; 24: 3324-3331.

AbstractBACKGROUND Routine hemodynamic monitoring parameters under general anesthesia, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and perfusion index (PI), do not solely reflect intraoperative nociceptive levels. We developed a hemodynamic model combining these 3 parameters for nociceptive responses during general anesthesia, and evaluated nociceptive responses to surgical skin incision. MATERIAL AND METHODS We first retrospectively performed discriminant analysis using 3 values - HR, SBP, and PI - to assess response to skin incision during tympanoplasty, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open gastrectomy to determine if combined use of these parameters differentiates nociceptive levels among these 3 surgeries. Secondly, ordinal logistic regression analysis was applied using the 3 parameters to develop an equation representing nociceptive response during general anesthesia, and then evaluated its utility to discern nociceptive responses to skin incision. RESULTS We developed the following hemodynamic model as calculated nociceptive response= -1+2/(1+ exp(-0.01 HR -0.02 SBP +0.17 PI)), and prospectively determined that calculated nociceptive responses to small skin incision for laparoscopic surgery were significantly lower than responses to large skin incision for laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS Our hemodynamic model using HR, SBP, and PI likely reflects nociceptive levels at skin incision during general anesthesia, and quantitatively discerned the difference in nociceptive responses to skin incision between laparoscopy and laparotomy. This model could be applicable to assess either real-time nociceptive responses or averaged nociceptive responses throughout surgery without using special equipment.

23 keywords...

hide…