-
- J S Richards.
- Department of Research, Spain Rehabilitation Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35233.
- Clin J Pain. 1992 Jun 1; 8 (2): 119-22.
AbstractThe problem of severe chronic pain following spinal cord injury (SCI) has been well delineated for many years. However, progress has been slow in determining which treatment procedures work for which type of SCI pain in a particular individual at a particular time. Reasons for such slow progress include the low incidence and prevalence of SCI making large series of patients unavailable for trials in many centers. Lack of a widely accepted SCI pain classification scheme has also limited the comparability of similar interventions carried out by different investigators. Design limitations of many existing studies that can be remedied in future investigations are reviewed. Finally, discussion of two conceptual models of SCI pain is presented and an argument raised for the utility of both.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..