-
Review Comparative Study
[Endoprosthetic replacement of the ankle joint].
- K Tillman.
- Rheumaklinik, Bad Bramstedt.
- Unfallchirurg. 2003 Dec 1; 106 (12): 1029-36; quiz 1037.
AbstractEndoprosthetic replacement of the ankle joint is considered to be a modern alternative of the well-tried fusions of the joint. We try to explain indications and limits of alloarthroplasty in comparison to arthrodesis. The recent technical evolution will be presented: starting with the two-component-("first generation") and leading to the three-component ("second generation") designs, Suitable for cemented and cementless implantation as well. Results of three-component endoprostheses in the literature and our own experiences with implants of both generations especially regarding the time of survival will be discussed. Basing on the actual knowledge, we try to deduce a prognosis of the future way of ankle replacement.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.