• Ann Am Thorac Soc · Feb 2019

    A Comparison of Global Lung Initiative 2012 with Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Spirometry Reference Values. Implications in Defining Obstruction.

    • Nikhil A Huprikar, Aaron B Holley, Andrew J Skabelund, Jackie A Hayes, Paul D Hiles, James K Aden, Michael J Morris, and Andrew M Hersh.
    • 1 Pulmonary and Critical Care Service, Department of Medicine, and.
    • Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Feb 1; 16 (2): 225-230.

    RationaleObstructive lung disease is diagnosed by a decreased ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC); however, there is no universally accepted lower limit of normal for the FEV1/FVC ratio. Current established reference values use the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) database. In 2012, the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) introduced GLI12, which is a compilation reference set that uses standard deviation values to define normal spirometry.ObjectivesTo evaluate the changes in classification of obstructive spirometry with use of GLI12 compared with NHANES III in a heterogeneous, multiracial population.MethodsWe evaluated the spirometry studies conducted in our pulmonary function laboratory between January 2005 and December 2015. NHANES III reference equations were calculated to predict lower limits of normal for FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC. GLI12 values were established using European Respiratory Society published computer software. FEV1 severity was graded using 2005 American Thoracic Society guidelines for NHANES III and using z-score-based criteria for GLI12. Asymmetric partition analysis evaluated agreement between the reference sets.ResultsA total of 11,888 studies were evaluated. Obstruction was diagnosed in 2,857 studies using NHANES III versus 2,489 studies using GLI12. Agreement regarding the presence or absence of obstruction occurred in 2,483 of studies with obstruction and 9,025 studies without obstruction (agreement, 96.8%; κ = 0.91). Of the studies with obstruction, 1,595 had agreement in severity grading. Overall, agreement regarding obstruction and severity grading occurred in 10,620 studies, representing 89.3% of all studies. A total of 380 studies (3.2%) had discordance regarding the presence or absence of obstruction, 34.0% (844 of the 2,483 obstruction studies) had a one-degree of change in FEV1 disease severity scoring, with 44 cases (1.8%) that had changes of two categories in FEV1 severity scores. No studies had greater than two degrees of change. Asymmetric partition analysis suggested that the highest clinically significant changes were seen in older individuals, particularly African American men older than 65.ConclusionsOur evaluation suggests that there is moderate overall agreement between NHANES III and GLI12. We found a 3.2% change in classification of obstruction when transitioning from NHANES III to GLI12. When incorporating a z-score-based FEV1 and GLI12 reference set, 10.7% of the spirometry studies had a change in their categorization. The disagreement between the two datasets was most pronounced in elderly subjects. Although we cannot endorse one reference set over the other, we highlight the potential implications of adopting the GLI12 reference sets and suggest caution when interpreting spirometry in the elderly.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.