• Michael O Russ, Ulrich Cleff, Heinrich Lanfermann, Rainer Schalnus, Wolfgang Enzensberger, and Andreas Kleinschmidt.
• Department of Neurology, Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität, Schleusenweg 2-16, D-60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. M.O.Russ@em.uni-frankfurt.de
• J Neuroimaging. 2002 Oct 1; 12 (4): 339-50.

AbstractDespite good clinical criteria for diagnosing optic neuritis (ON), only a few techniques can precisely assess its impact on visual brain function. The authors studied whether functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of visual activation reliably reflects the cerebral consequences of acute unilateral ON, and how fMRI correlates with clinical function and visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Twenty ON patients, before and after steroid treatment, were compared to 20 controls. Each eye was stimulated separately with a checkerboard pattern reversing at 1, 2, 4, and 8 Hz. VEPs were recorded the same day. Initially, affected eye responses differed significantly from those of unaffected counterparts and controls in 12 patients. Post hoc classification by fMRI criteria was correct in approximately 85%. fMRI and VEP response parameters (as well as visual acuity) correlated significantly. The higher stimulation frequencies yielded greater fMRI responses from unaffected eyes, but not from affected eyes, in controls. The fMRI responses were quantifiable in every subject, whereas in 11 ON eyes, no VEPs were obtained during the acute stage. The authors conclude that fMRI is sensitive to the cerebral response alteration during ON and might therefore contribute to evaluating the temporal evolution of the visual functional deficit during recovery or therapy.

22 keywords...

hide…