-
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr · Jan 2013
ReviewEURRECA-Evidence-based methodology for deriving micronutrient recommendations.
- Rosalie A M Dhonukshe-Rutten, Jildau Bouwman, Kerry A Brown, Adriënne E J M Cavelaars, Rachel Collings, Evangelia Grammatikaki, Lisette C P G M de Groot, Mirjana Gurinovic, Linda J Harvey, Maria Hermoso, Rachel Hurst, Bas Kremer, Joy Ngo, Romana Novakovic, Monique M Raats, Fanny Rollin, Lluis Serra-Majem, Olga W Souverein, Lada Timotijevic, and Pieter Van't Veer.
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. rosalie.dhonukshe-rutten@wur.nl
- Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013 Jan 1; 53 (10): 999-1040.
AbstractThe EURopean micronutrient RECommendations Aligned (EURRECA) Network of Excellence explored the process of setting micronutrient recommendations to address the variance in recommendations across Europe. Work centered upon the transparent assessment of nutritional requirements via a series of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. In addition, the necessity of assessing nutritional requirements and the policy context of setting micronutrient recommendations was investigated. Findings have been presented in a framework that covers nine activities clustered into four stages: stage one "Defining the problem" describes Activities 1 and 2: "Identifying the nutrition-related health problem" and "Defining the process"; stage two "Monitoring and evaluating" describes Activities 3 and 7: "Establishing appropriate methods," and "Nutrient intake and status of population groups"; stage three "Deriving dietary reference values" describes Activities 4, 5, and 6: "Collating sources of evidence," "Appraisal of the evidence," and "Integrating the evidence"; stage four "Using dietary reference values in policy making" describes Activities 8 and 9: "Identifying policy options," and "Evaluating policy implementation." These activities provide guidance on how to resolve various issues when deriving micronutrient requirements and address the methodological and policy decisions, which may explain the current variation in recommendations across Europe. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition for the following free supplemental files: Additional text, tables, and figures.].
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.