-
Surg Obes Relat Dis · May 2008
Comparative StudyIncidence and management of enteric leaks after gastric bypass for morbid obesity during a 10-year period.
- Evren Durak, William B Inabnet, Beth Schrope, Dan Davis, Amna Daud, Luca Milone, and Marc Bessler.
- Division of Minimal Access Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA.
- Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May 1; 4 (3): 389-93.
BackgroundTo describe the incidence, etiology, outcomes, and management of enteric leaks in patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic gastric bypass.MethodsFrom November 1996 to November 2006, 1133 patients underwent primary gastric bypass at Columbia University, New York-Presbyterian Hospital. A retrospective review of our prospective bariatric surgery registry identified 17 patients (1.5%) who developed a clinically apparent enteric leak after surgery. The demographic and outcome data were studied.ResultsThe mean body mass index was 52 kg/m(2) (range 35-65), and 15 (88%) of the 17 patients were women. The mean number of co-morbidities per patient was 1.3 and included hypertension in 11, diabetes in 9, and sleep apnea in 6. Ten patients had previously undergone abdominal surgery. The enteric leak was diagnosed by radiographic studies in 12 patients (9 of 12 by upper gastrointestinal series and 3 of 6 by computed tomography); the remaining 5 patients were diagnosed at re-exploration. Of the 17 patients, 12 (70%) were treated by laparoscopy and 5 (29%) by laparotomy. The mean time from completion of the index procedure to the diagnosis of the leak was 2 days (range 1-5) for patients treated by laparoscopy versus 4 days (range 1-6) for patients treated by laparotomy (P <.05). The patients treated by laparoscopy experienced a shorter hospital stay, but the difference was not statistically significant (mean 11.4 days, range 6-36, versus 18 days, range 7-33; P >.05). One of the laparoscopic patients (5.9%) died.ConclusionEnteric leak is a significant complication after gastric bypass. Prompt treatment should be based on clinical suspicion, because contrast and cross-sectional imaging studies might not be reliable diagnostic tests. A laparoscopic index procedure might be associated with an earlier diagnosis.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.