• Annals of plastic surgery · Apr 2003

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Hemostatic effect of Vivostat patient-derived fibrin sealant on split-thickness skin graft donor sites.

    • David B Drake and Lesley G Wong.
    • DeCamp Burn and Wound Healing Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0376, USA.
    • Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Apr 1; 50 (4): 367-72.

    AbstractTopical hemostatic agents are used frequently to control bleeding of skin graft donor sites. In this study, the hemostatic properties of Vivostat (Vivolution A/S, Birkerød, Denmark) patient-derived fibrin sealant were compared with a control group of spray thrombin solution, which is considered an industry standard for topical hemostasis. Treatments were applied simultaneously to two randomly chosen halves of a single split-thickness single donor site in patients in five United States surgical centers. The time to achieve satisfactory hemostasis (< or =10 min) was estimated on each half of the wound as the time at which active bleeding had stopped and the wound was suitable for application of a surgical dressing. The time to hemostasis of wounds treated with Vivostat (Vivolution A/S) patient-derived sealant was significantly shorter in comparison with wounds treated with thrombin solution (medians: Vivostat, 31 seconds; thrombin, 58 seconds; p=0.0012). No abnormalities in wound healing were reported for either treatment site 1 week after the operation. Vivostat (Vivolution A/S) sealant is a more rapidly effective topical hemostatic agent than thrombin on split-thickness skin graft donor sites.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…