• David O Warner, Robert S Isaak, Cathleen Peterson-Layne, Cynthia A Lien, Huaping Sun, Anna O Menzies, Daniel J Cole, Rupa J Dainer, Brenda G Fahy, Alex Macario, Santhanam Suresh, and Ann E Harman.
• From the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
• Anesth. Analg. 2020 Jan 1; 130 (1): 258-264.

AbstractWith its first administration of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in 2018, the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) became the first US medical specialty certifying board to incorporate this type of assessment into its high-stakes certification examination system. The fundamental rationale for the ABA's introduction of the OSCE is to include an assessment that allows candidates for board certification to demonstrate what they actually "do" in domains relevant to clinical practice. Inherent in this rationale is that the OSCE will capture competencies not well assessed in the current written and oral examinations-competencies that will allow the ABA to judge whether a candidate meets the standards expected for board certification more properly. This special article describes the ABA's journey from initial conceptualization through first administration of the OSCE, including the format of the OSCE, the process for scenario development, the standardized patient program that supports OSCE administration, examiner training, scoring, and future assessment of reliability, validity, and impact of the OSCE. This information will be beneficial to both those involved in the initial certification process, such as residency graduate candidates and program directors, and others contemplating the use of high-stakes summative OSCE assessments.

13 keywords...

hide…