• Zayed Alsulami, Imti Choonara, and Sharon Conroy.
• Academic Division of Child Health, School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK.
• J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jun 1; 70 (6): 1404-13.

AimTo evaluate how closely double-checking policies are followed by nurses in paediatric areas and also to identify the types, frequency and rates of medication administration errors that occur despite the double-checking process.BackgroundDouble-checking by two nurses is an intervention used in many UK hospitals to prevent or reduce medication administration errors. There is, however, insufficient evidence to either support or refute the practice of double-checking in terms of medication error risk reduction.DesignProspective observational study.MethodsThis was a prospective observational study of paediatric nurses' adherence to the double-checking process for medication administration from April-July 2012.ResultsDrug dose administration events (n = 2000) were observed. Independent drug dose calculation, rate of administering intravenous bolus drugs and labelling of flush syringes were the steps with lowest adherence rates. Drug dose calculation was only double-checked independently in 591 (30%) drug administrations. There was a statistically significant difference in nurses' adherence rate to the double-checking steps between weekdays and weekends in nine of the 15 evaluated steps. Medication administration errors (n = 191) or deviations from policy were observed, at a rate of 9·6% of drug administrations. These included 64 drug doses, which were left for parents to administer without nurse observation.ConclusionThere was variation between paediatric nurses' adherence to double-checking steps during medication administration. The most frequent type of administration errors or deviation from policy involved the medicine being given to the parents to administer to the child when the nurse was not present.© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

27 keywords...

hide…