• World Neurosurg · Feb 2020

    Comparative Study

    Quantitative Anatomical Comparison of Anterior, Antero-Lateral and Lateral, Microsurgical and Endoscopic Approaches to the Middle Cranial Fossa.

    • Giorgio Saraceno, Edoardo Agosti, Jimmy Qiu, Barbara Buffoli, Marco Ferrari, Elena Raffetti, Francesco Belotti, Marco Ravanelli, Davide Mattavelli, Alberto Schreiber, Lena Hirtler, Luigi F Rodella, Roberto Maroldi, Piero Nicolai, Fred Gentili, Walter Kucharczyk, Marco M Fontanella, and Francesco Doglietto.
    • Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
    • World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb 1; 134: e682-e730.

    ObjectiveTo quantitatively compare different microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the middle cranial fossa in a preclinical setting with a novel, computer-based research method.MethodsDifferent approaches were performed bilaterally in 5 head and neck specimens that underwent high-resolution computed tomography scans: 5 transcranial anterolateral (supraorbital, mini-pterional, pterional, pterional-transzygomatic, fronto-temporal-orbito-zygomatic) without and with anterior clinoidectomy; 2 transcranial lateral (subtemporal and subtemporal-transzygomatic); 2 endoscopic transnasal (transpterygoid, transpterygoid to infratemporal fossa); 2 endoscopic transorbital (superior eyelid and inferolateral), and endoscopic transmaxillary. A dedicated navigation system was used to quantify surgical working volumes and exposure of different areas of the middle cranial fossa (ApproachViewer, part of GTx-Eyes II, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada). Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear model with bootstrap resampling.ResultsEndoscopic transnasal and fronto-temporal-orbito-zygomatic approaches with anterior clinoidectomy showed the largest surgical volumes. Endoscopic approaches allowed a wider exposure of medial anatomical surfaces (e.g., the petrous apex) compared with transcranial ones. Transcranial approaches with larger craniotomies allowed the widest exposure of superomedial anatomical structures (e.g., roof of cavernous sinus). The resection of the zygomatic arch allowed exposure of more medial surfaces with an inferior to superior trajectory.ConclusionsThis study implemented a novel neuronavigation-based research method to quantitatively compare different approaches to the middle cranial fossa; its results might guide, after consideration of clinical implications, the choice of the neurosurgical approach to different areas of this complex skull base region.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…