• K Okada, S Okada, and K Nishitani.
• Department of Anesthesia, Center for Adult Disease, Kurashiki.
• Masui. 1998 Jan 1; 47 (1): 64-8.

AbstractCombined spinal-epidural anesthesia is a useful technique. However, there has been no attempt to investigate the risk of epidural opioid, especially buprenorphine, flux through the dural hole. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of epidural buprenorphine administered across the dura into subarachnoid space, between two different methods of administration; bolus injection (Group I) and continuous infusion (Group II). Sixty patients for transvaginal hysterectomy were divided into two groups. Group I received buprenorphine 0.1-0.2 mg with 0.25% bupivacaine, and Group II 0.4 mg with 0.25% bupivacaine 40 ml continuously (infusion rate was 1.7 ml.h-1). Pain relief was similar in both groups, but the total buprenorphine requirement was lower in Group I than in Group II. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in Group I than that in Group II, 73% and 16%, respectively. It indicates that the increase of nausea and vomiting is predominantly determined by a high rate of flux into subarachnoid space and only partly determined by blood concentrations. In contrast to continuous infusion, the drug movement through the dural hole may increase by bolus injection due to its higher pressure. We recommend careful injection of epidural buprenorphine such as by continuous infusion with low pressure after combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

26 keywords...

hide…