• Rebecca Coffey, Rachel Penny, Larry Jones, and J Kevin Bailey.
• The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. Tenth Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210 United States. Electronic address: Rebecca.coffey@osumc.edu.
• Burns. 2020 Jun 1; 46 (4): 836-841.

IntroductionRecent advances in burn care have resulted in the transition of care from inpatient to outpatient. There is a growing appreciation that with improved survival, meaningful markers of quality need to include recovery of form, function, and reconstruction. Capture of the data describing care delivered in the outpatient setting is being missed.MethodsDevelopment of our outpatient database included providers, registrar, program manager, and outpatient nursing staff. Data points were included if they described the population, and epidemiology of our patients, were useful for programmatic changes and improvements as well as anticipated research focus areas.ResultsThe database platform chosen was Midas+™ because it was in use by hospital quality and integrated with the electronic medical record. Fields were customized based on changing program needs and are updated for new programs or outcomes measures. Reports can be easily built and both outpatients and inpatients are included. This allows for longitudinal tracking of burn patients. Ongoing additions to original data points include variables to track outcomes related to laser therapy for scar management, time to custom garment donning, and to track functional outcomes. Epidemiologic data collected is used to target high-risk populations for prevention and outreach efforts. Outcome data is used for evaluation of programs and care.ConclusionsHigh quality databases serve to measure effectiveness of care and offer insight for areas of improvement. There is a clear need for inclusion of outpatient activity in the National Burn Registry (NBR).Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…