• Crit Care Resusc · Dec 2019

    Internet health information use by surrogate decision makers of patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a multicentre survey.

    • Alexander Das, Matthew Anstey, Frances Bass, David Blythe, Heidi Buhr, Lewis Campbell, Ashish Davda, Anthony Delaney, David Gattas, Cameron Green, Janet Ferrier, Naomi Hammond, Annamaria Palermo, Susan Pellicano, Margaret Phillips, Adrian Regli, Brigit Roberts, Michelle Ross-King, Vineet Sarode, Shannon Simpson, Shakira Spiller, Kirsty Sullivan, Ravindranath Tiruvoipati, Haren Frank van FV Division of Critical Care, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia., Sharon Waterson, Lai Kin Yaw, and Edward Litton.
    • Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
    • Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Dec 1; 21 (4): 305-10.

    ObjectivesTo investigate the use, understanding, trust and influence of the internet and other sources of health information used by the next of kin (NOK) of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).DesignMulticentre structured survey.SettingThe ICUs of 13 public and private Australian hospitals.ParticipantsNOK who self-identified as the primary surrogate decision maker for a patient admitted to the ICU.Main Outcome MeasuresThe frequency, understanding, trust and influence of online sources of health information, and the quality of health websites visited using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health websites.ResultsThere were 473 survey responses. The median ICU admission days and number of ICU visits by the NOK at the time of completing the survey was 3 (IQR, 2-6 days) and 4 (IQR, 2-7), respectively. The most commonly reported sources of health information used very frequently were the ICU nurse (55.6%), ICU doctor (38.7%), family (23.3%), hospital doctor (21.4%), and the internet (11.3%). Compared with the 243 NOK (51.6%) not using the internet, NOK using the internet were less likely to report complete understanding (odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.88), trust (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.59), or influence (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.88) associated with the ICU doctor. Overall, the quality of the 40 different reported websites accessed was moderately high.ConclusionsA substantial proportion of ICU NOK report using the internet as a source of health information. Internet use is associated with lower reported understanding, trust and influence of the ICU doctor.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…