-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics.
- Sabue Mulangu, Lori E Dodd, Richard T Davey, Tshiani MbayaOlivierOFrom Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Democratic Republic of Congo (S.M., O.T.M., D.M., M.L.M., D.N., A.T.O., A.I., R.A., J.-J.M.-T.); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Michael Proschan, Daniel Mukadi, Mariano Lusakibanza Manzo, Didier Nzolo, Antoine Tshomba Oloma, Augustin Ibanda, Rosine Ali, Sinaré Coulibaly, Adam C Levine, Rebecca Grais, Janet Diaz, H Clifford Lane, Jean-Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum, PALM Writing Group, Billy Sivahera, Modet Camara, Richard Kojan, Robert Walker, Bonnie Dighero-Kemp, Huyen Cao, Philippe Mukumbayi, Placide Mbala-Kingebeni, Steve Ahuka, Sarah Albert, Tyler Bonnett, Ian Crozier, Michael Duvenhage, Calvin Proffitt, Marc Teitelbaum, Thomas Moench, Jamila Aboulhab, Kevin Barrett, Kelly Cahill, Katherine Cone, Risa Eckes, Lisa Hensley, Betsey Herpin, Elizabeth Higgs, Julie Ledgerwood, Jerome Pierson, Mary Smolskis, Ydrissa Sow, John Tierney, Sumathi Sivapalasingam, Wendy Holman, Nikki Gettinger, David Vallée, Jacqueline Nordwall, and PALM Consortium Study Team.
- From Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale, Democratic Republic of Congo (S.M., O.T.M., D.M., M.L.M., D.N., A.T.O., A.I., R.A., J.-J.M.-T.); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (L.E.D., R.T.D., M.P., H.C.L.); the Alliance for International Medical Action, Dakar, Senegal (S.C.); International Medical Corps, Los Angeles (A.C.L.); Epicentre, Médecins sans Frontières, Paris (R.G.); and the World Health Organization, Geneva (J.D.).The affiliations of the members of the PALM Writing Group are as follows: the Alliance for International Medical Action (B.S., M.C., R.K.); the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (R.W.); Battelle (B.D.-K.); Gilead (H.C.); Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale (P.M., P.M.-K., S. Ahuka); Leidos (S. Albert, T.B., I.C., M.D., C.P., M.T.); Mapp Biopharmaceutical (T.M.); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (J.A., K.B., K. Cahill, K. Cone, R.E., L.H., B.H., E.H., J.L., J.P., M.S., Y.S., J.T.); Regeneron (S.S.); Ridgeback Biotherapeutics (W.H.); the Mitchell Group (N.G., D.V.); and University of Minnesota (J.N.).
- N. Engl. J. Med. 2019 Dec 12; 381 (24): 229323032293-2303.
BackgroundAlthough several experimental therapeutics for Ebola virus disease (EVD) have been developed, the safety and efficacy of the most promising therapies need to be assessed in the context of a randomized, controlled trial.MethodsWe conducted a trial of four investigational therapies for EVD in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where an outbreak began in August 2018. Patients of any age who had a positive result for Ebola virus RNA on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay were enrolled. All patients received standard care and were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to intravenous administration of the triple monoclonal antibody ZMapp (the control group), the antiviral agent remdesivir, the single monoclonal antibody MAb114, or the triple monoclonal antibody REGN-EB3. The REGN-EB3 group was added in a later version of the protocol, so data from these patients were compared with those of patients in the ZMapp group who were enrolled at or after the time the REGN-EB3 group was added (the ZMapp subgroup). The primary end point was death at 28 days.ResultsA total of 681 patients were enrolled from November 20, 2018, to August 9, 2019, at which time the data and safety monitoring board recommended that patients be assigned only to the MAb114 and REGN-EB3 groups for the remainder of the trial; the recommendation was based on the results of an interim analysis that showed superiority of these groups to ZMapp and remdesivir with respect to mortality. At 28 days, death had occurred in 61 of 174 patients (35.1%) in the MAb114 group, as compared with 84 of 169 (49.7%) in the ZMapp group (P = 0.007), and in 52 of 155 (33.5%) in the REGN-EB3 group, as compared with 79 of 154 (51.3%) in the ZMapp subgroup (P = 0.002). A shorter duration of symptoms before admission and lower baseline values for viral load and for serum creatinine and aminotransferase levels each correlated with improved survival. Four serious adverse events were judged to be potentially related to the trial drugs.ConclusionsBoth MAb114 and REGN-EB3 were superior to ZMapp in reducing mortality from EVD. Scientifically and ethically sound clinical research can be conducted during disease outbreaks and can help inform the outbreak response. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; PALM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03719586.).Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.