• Seong Ho Bae, Seung Min Son, Won Chul Shin, Tae Sik Goh, and Jung Sub Lee.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bonebarun Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
• Spine. 2020 May 15; 45 (10): E582-E586.

Study DesignCross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis OBJECTIVE.: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of an adapted Korean version of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis version (BIDQ-S).Summary Of Background DataA modified version of the BIDQ instrument has been validated in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to assess the perception of spinal appearance and psychological disturbance. However, there is no culturally adapted, reliable, and validated BIDQ-S for the Korean population.MethodsTranslation/retranslation of the English version of the BIDQ-S was conducted, and all steps of the cross-cultural adaptation process were performed. The Korean version of the BIDQ-S (K-BIDQ-S) and the previously validated appearance domain of the Korean version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Outcomes questionnaire (K-SRS-22) and Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (K-SAQ) were mailed to 152 patients with AIS. Reliability assessments were conducted using κ statistics to assess item agreements, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Cronbach α values were calculated. Convergent validity was evaluated by comparing the scores of the K-BIDQ-S, K-SAQ, and K-SRS-22 appearance domain and discriminant validity by analyzing relationships between K-BIDQ-S score and patient characteristics.ResultsAll items of the K-BIDQ-S had κ values of agreement >0.6. The K-BIDQ-S showed excellent test/retest reliability with an ICC of 0.912. Internal consistency of the K-BIDQ-S was found to be very good (α = 0.880). Convergent validity testing demonstrated good correlations between the K-BIDQ-S and K-SAQ (r = 0.617), and between the K-BIDQ-S and K-SRS-22 (r = -651). The correlation between the K-BIDQ-S and major curve magnitude was significant (r = 0.688). Discriminant validity was confirmed by significant differences in K-BIDQ-S scores among patients requiring observation, bracing, or surgery.ConclusionThe K-BIDQ-S showed satisfactory reliability and validity, and thus, is considered suitable for the evaluation of spinal deformity appearance in Korean-speaking patients with AIS.Level Of Evidence3.

18 keywords...

hide…