• Clin Pharmacokinet · Feb 1987

    Review

    Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the use of plasma expanders.

    • U Klotz and H Kroemer.
    • Clin Pharmacokinet. 1987 Feb 1; 12 (2): 123-35.

    AbstractThis review deals with the pharmacokinetics of dextrans and hydroxyethylstarch, the most commonly used plasma expanders. The complex composition of these colloidal agents (broad range of molecular weight distribution in vitro and in vivo) confounds their specific assay and meaningful pharmacokinetic analysis. In addition, the time-dependent decline of plasma concentrations of the plasma expanders is at least biphasic, and in some clinical studies the time period for plasma concentration monitoring has been inadequate to characterise the terminal elimination phase. According to their average molecular weight, dextrans can be differentiated into dextran 1, dextran 40, dextran 60 and dextran 70. Metabolism of dextrans by dextranases and extrarenal excretion account for only 2 to 10% of the overall drug loss from the body. Persistence of dextrans in the systemic circulation and elimination by the renal route are dependent on the size of dextrans and their molecular weight distribution. Dextran species with a molecular weight below 15,000 daltons are filtered unrestricted, and consequently the elimination half-life of dextran 1 is relatively short (2 hours) and that of dextran 40 (10 hours) or dextran 60 (42 hours) much longer. In patients with renal insufficiency elimination is impaired in parallel to the reduction in glomerular filtration rate, and smaller doses are advisable in these patients. Dosage reduction might be also indicated if multiple infusions of dextrans are used, since dextran 40 accumulates considerably during long term use (particularly the fractions with higher molecular weights). As only about 50 to 70% of a single dose could be recovered within 48 hours in the urine, the remainder of the dose is probably stored somewhere in the body. Disposition of hydroxyethylstarch is dependent on 2 major factors. As with dextrans, the molecular weight distribution affects the rate of renal elimination. In addition, the degree of substitution with hydroxyethyl groups mainly determines the metabolism of hydroxyethylstarch by alpha-amylase, and thus the overall elimination rate. A higher molecular weight range (e.g. hydroxyethylstarch 450,000 vs 200,000) and a more extensive degree of substitution (e.g. 0.7 vs 0.5) result in a slower elimination, as can be seen by comparing the half-life values of hydroxyethylstarch 450/0.7 (48 days) and hydroxyethylstarch 200/0.5 (20 days). Since only 40 to 65% of an infused dose could be recovered in the urine in humans, the remainder of the dose may be stored in the body. Animal experiments suggest that certain fractions of hydroxyethylstarch might be stored in some tissues.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.