• Cleft Palate Cran J · Sep 2012

    Facial skeletal morphology in growing children with Pierre Robin sequence.

    • Yoshi F Shen, Karin Vargervik, Snehlata Oberoi, and Radhika Chigurupati.
    • Department of Orofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
    • Cleft Palate Cran J. 2012 Sep 1; 49 (5): 553-60.

    ObjectiveThe purpose was to compare the jaw size, jaw relationship, and facial proportions of children with nonsyndromic Pierre Robin sequence with children with nonsyndromic or isolated cleft palate.DesignThis is a retrospective cohort study comparing radiographic findings in children with Pierre Robin sequence or isolated cleft palate at two time intervals: ages 4 to 7 years (T1) and ages 10 to 13 years (T2). Linear and angular measurements were obtained using cephalograms; the cephalometric values were compared with unpaired t tests, assuming unequal variances.SettingThe study was conducted at the Center for Craniofacial Anomalies at the University of California, San Francisco.PatientsThe sample included 13 children with Pierre Robin sequence and 14 children with isolated cleft palate who were followed at University of California, San Francisco, craniofacial anomalies clinic during the period from 1971 to 2007 and met the inclusion criteria.Main Outcome MeasuresThe outcome measures were mandibular length, maxillary length, and sagittal jaw relationship in Pierre Robin sequence and isolated cleft palate children at T1 and T2.ResultsDuring early childhood (T1: 4 to 7 years), mandibular length (Co-Gn) was similar in both Pierre Robin sequence and isolated cleft palate groups, as was the maxillary length (Co-A). In older children (T2: 10 to 13 years) mandibular length was significantly shorter in the Pierre Robin sequence group compared with the isolated cleft palate group (difference  =  10.9 mm, p  =  .009). Maxillary length in Pierre Robin sequence and isolated cleft palate groups was similar at T2 but significantly shorter in comparison to age-matched norms with a difference of 14.5 mm (p  =  .037) for Pierre Robin sequence and 12.4 mm (p  =  .045) for isolated cleft palate. Children with Pierre Robin sequence did not show a sagittal jaw discrepancy due to a proportionate deficiency in maxillary and mandibular length; whereas, children with isolated cleft palate showed a greater sagittal jaw discrepancy due to normal mandibular length and deficiency in maxillary length.ConclusionOur study confirms the findings of some previous studies that suggest that children with nonsyndromic Pierre Robin sequence have a proportionate retrusion of the maxilla and mandible, resulting in a convex facial profile by early adolescence.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…