• Kunal Vakharia, Stephan A Munich, Muhammad Waqas, Elad I Levy, and Adnan H Siddiqui.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
• Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1; 86 (Suppl 1): S55-S63.

AbstractSeveral studies have shown the efficacy and feasibility of flow diversion for the endovascular treatment of wide-necked and otherwise anatomically challenging intracranial aneurysms (IA). Technological advances have led to successful long-term occlusion rates and a safety profile for flow-diverter stents that parallels other endovascular and open surgical options for these lesions. With growing indications for use of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) to include IAs up to the internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus, understanding the nuances of this technology is increasingly relevant. Furthermore, there is a growing body of literature on the use of flow diversion to treat distal (up to A2, M2, and P2), ruptured, and posterior circulation aneurysms, although these applications are "off-label" at present. In this manuscript, we discuss the expanding role of flow diversion in the ICA and compare this technique with other endovascular options for the treatment of ICA IAs. We also discuss technical nuances of the deployment of flow diverters for the treatment of challenging lesions and in difficult and tortuous anatomy.Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

21 keywords...

hide…