• Steven M Falowski, Jason E Pope, David A Provenzano, Michael Hanes, Paul P Su, Jay Shah, and Michael Fishman.
• Director Functional Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA.
• Neuromodulation. 2020 Oct 1; 23 (7): 926-937.

IntroductionDespite Accredited Counsel of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) guidance and criteria, there remains variability in training both within each specialty and across the specialties involved in the delivery of neuromodulation. NANS advocates for the efficacious and safe the implementation of neuromodulation and therefore an educational mentoring program with a defined educational platform is needed.Materials And MethodsThis is a structured, patient centered, and evidence-based approach mentorship program performed more than one year. Mentor/Mentee pairs started in 2015 and data collected were more than a five-year period.ResultsThere was a 70%-86% response rate on each survey administered. All except one respondent reported that the mentorship program met their previously declared expectations. All the respondents self-reported at least a moderate increase in their knowledge in the field of neuromodulation while 54% of the respondents felt their knowledge in the field to have greatly increased. Most respondents reported an increase in the number of spinal cord stimulator trials and permanent implants performed after the mentorship program. The self-reporting of mentees competencies at the conclusion of the program was statistically significant for higher competency scores in all areas assessed.ConclusionsThe NANs mentorship program met expectations and implementation goals by improving neuromodulation education including covering patient care, delivery, and training topics. The mentoring program provides a structured framework for extending formal physician neuromodulation education outside of direct fellowship training.© 2019 International Neuromodulation Society.

17 keywords...

hide…