• Nicole M Dubosh, Katherine L Boyle, Stephanie Carreiro, Tuyen Yankama, and Alden M Landry.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, One Deaconess Road, Rosenburg 2, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: ndubosh@bidmc.harvard.edu.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 1; 38 (7): 1357-1361.

ObjectiveTo describe differences in funded grants between male and female faculty in two academic emergency departments.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of grant funding at two academic emergency departments from January 2012-September 2018. We queried the grants department databases at each institution and obtained records of all funded grants for emergency medicine (EM) faculty. We extracted the following information for each award: gender of the principal investigator (PI), PI academic rank, grant mechanism (government, institutional, industry, organizational), and percent effort. Differences by gender were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon-rank sum.ResultsOne-hundred and thirty grants were awarded to EM faculty at the two institutions during the study period. Of the funded grants, 35 (27%) of recipients were female. Among grant recipients, females held lower academic ranking than males (p-value < 0.001): Instructor (49% vs 51%), Assistant Professor (36% vs 64%), Associate Professor (9% vs 91%), and Professor (0% vs 100%), respectively. Organizational grants were dispersed equally between funded faculty, but females received a fewer government, industry, and institutional grants (p-value = 0.007). Female grant recipients were awarded a higher median percent of effort compared to males (14% [IQR: 3-51] vs 8% [IQR: 1-15], respectively, p-value = 0.023).ConclusionIn this multicenter analysis, gender discrepancies exist among funded grants of EM faculty. Male recipients had higher academic ranking than their female counterparts. Female recipients were less likely to have government, institutional, and industry grants but received a greater percent effort on funding that was awarded.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

21 keywords...

hide…