• Stephen T Wegener, Renan C Castillo, Sara E Heins, Anna N Bradford, Mary Zadnik Newell, Andrew N Pollak, and Ellen J MacKenzie.
• Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
• Rehabil Psychol. 2014 May 1; 59 (2): 203-10.

ObjectiveAlthough the management of acute traumatic injury has improved, long-term functional outcomes remain poor. Data suggest major improvements in outcome will require comprehensive, self-management (SM) interventions. However, little is known about trauma survivors' willingness to participate in such interventions. The goal of this study was to create and validate an instrument based on the stages of change (SOC) framework to assess readiness to engage in SM programs following acute traumatic injury.MethodThe Readiness to Engage in Self-Management after Acute Traumatic Injury (RESMATI) was developed based on SOC theory. Participants (N = 150) were admitted to a Level I trauma center for treatment of severe trauma and completed the RESMATI 3 to 12 months postinjury. A random sample (n = 60) completed a reassessment 1 month later to determine item stability. A principal components analysis and an exploratory factor analysis were conducted.ResultsThe analyses of the 34 RESMATI items yielded a 5-factor model, collapsed into 3 domains based on SOC theory. Two factors were classified as "precontemplation," 2 factors were classified as "contemplation," and 1 factor was classified as "action/maintenance." All 3 domains had good internal consistency reliability (.71 to .92) and moderate test-retest reliability (.56 and .73).ConclusionsThe exploratory factor analysis yielded 3 domains that were consistent with the SOC model. Two notable exceptions were the lack of a "preparation" domain and lack of distinction between the action and maintenance stages. The RESMATI is a reliable instrument that requires further testing to establish validity and utility in identifying individuals' readiness to engage in SM following acute traumatic injury.(c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

27 keywords...

hide…