• Ilmo H Kellokumpu, Matti I Kairaluoma, Kyösti P Nuorva, Hannu J Kautiainen, and Ismo T Jantunen.
• Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland. Ilmo.Kellokumpu@Ksshp.Fi
• Dis. Colon Rectum. 2012 Aug 1; 55 (8): 854-63.

BackgroundLaparoscopic resection for rectal cancer has remained controversial because of the lack of level 1 evidence regarding oncologic safety and long-term survival.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer on clinical and oncologic outcome in the multimodal setting.DesignThis is a review of prospectively gathered data from a single-institution rectal cancer database.SettingsThis study was conducted in the Central Hospital of Central Finland.PatientsFrom January 1999 to December 2006, 191 selected patients were included.InterventionsOne hundred patients underwent laparoscopic resection, and 91 patients, also suitable for laparoscopic surgery, underwent open major rectal resection in the multimodal setting.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main measures of outcome were early recovery and short- and long-term morbidity; local recurrence and survival were secondary outcomes.LimitationsThis is not a randomized study.ResultsThe study groups were balanced for baseline characteristics. Conversion rate to open surgery was 22%. Laparoscopic surgery resulted in significantly less bleeding (175 mL vs 500 mL, p < 0.001), 1 day earlier recovery of normal diet (3 days vs 4 days, p = 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7 days vs 9 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative 30-day mortality (1% vs 3%), morbidity (31% vs 43%), readmission (11% vs 15%), and reoperation (6% vs 9%) rates were similar in the 2 groups, but significantly fewer patients in the laparoscopic group had long-term complications (19% vs 36%, p = 0.033). The 5-year disease-free survival (78% vs 80%, p = 0.74) and local recurrence (5% vs 6%, p = 0.66) rates were similar in the laparoscopic and open group for those 175 patients treated for cure.ConclusionLaparoscopic surgery resulted in faster postoperative recovery and fewer long-term complications than open surgery without apparently compromising the long-term oncologic outcome. Our results indicate that laparoscopic rectal resection is an acceptable alternative to open surgery in selected patients with rectal cancer.

31 keywords...

hide…