• Natasha Olby, Emily Griffith, Jon Levine, and CANSORT SCI Investigators.
• Department of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
• J. Neurotrauma. 2020 Sep 15; 37 (18): 1991-1998.

AbstractNaturally occurring thoracolumbar spinal cord injury (SCI) is common in dogs, and multi-center veterinary clinical studies can serve as translational tools to identify potentially effective therapies for human clinical trials. Assessment of gait is a key outcome, and several scales are used in dogs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an international group of researchers could score gait reliably, to compare and contrast the performance of gait scales and to describe appropriate data analysis techniques. A training module was developed for a binary scale, modified Frankel Scale (MFS), Texas SCI Scale (TSCIS), and Open Field Scale (OFS). Raters viewed the training module, scored five training video clips to achieve proficiency, then scored 30 video clips from 10 dogs recovering from SCI. Interrater reliability was calculated, and correlation between scales was examined. Ceiling effect was described. Twenty raters with differing experience participated. The training module took 16 min to view. Raters chose identical binary outcomes in 597 of 600 observations. Intraclass correlation for MFS, TSCIS, and OFS was excellent at 0.85, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively, regardless of rater expertise. Ceiling effect occurred in all dogs that recovered ambulation, particularly using MFS and binary outcome. The TSCIS and OFS captured recovery of ambulatory dogs better, and addition of scores on hopping and proprioception mitigated ceiling effect. We conclude that gait in dogs with SCI can be scored reliably after training. A variety of different gait scales can be used in multi-center trials to capture outcome in different ways.

22 keywords...

hide…