• Br J Anaesth · May 1996

    Comparative Study

    Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation.

    • A M De Wolf, J A Freeman, V L Scott, W Tullock, D A Smith, D F Kisor, S Kerls, and D R Cook.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA.
    • Br J Anaesth. 1996 May 1; 76 (5): 624-8.

    AbstractWe determined the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium, one of the 10 isomers of atracurium, in 14 patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation and in 11 control patients with normal hepatic and renal function undergoing elective surgery. Blood samples were collected for 8 h after i.v. bolus administration of cisatracurium 0.1 mg kg-1 (2 x ED95). Plasma concentrations of cisatracurium and its metabolites were determined using an HPLC method with fluorescence detection. Pharmacokinetic variables were determined using non-compartmental methods. Neuromuscular block was assessed by measuring the electromyographic evoked response of the adductor pollicis muscle to train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve using a Puritan-Bennett Datex (Helsinki, Finland) monitor. Pharmacodynamic modelling was completed using semi-parametric effect-compartment analysis. Volume of distribution at steady state was 195 (SD 38) ml kg-1 in liver transplant patients and 161 (23) ml kg-1 in control patients (P < 0.05), plasma clearance was 6.6 (1.1) ml kg-1 min-1 in liver transplant patients and 5.7 (0.8) ml kg-1 min-1 in control patients (P < 0.05), but elimination half-lives were similar: 24.4 (2.9) min in liver transplant patients vs 23.5 (3.5) min in control patients (ns). The time to maximum block was 2.4 (0.8) min in liver transplant patients compared with 3.3 (1.0) min in control patients (P < 0.05), but the clinical effective duration of action (time to 25% recovery) was similar: 53.5 (11.9) min in liver transplant patients compared with 46.9 (6.9) min in control patients (ns). The recovery index (25-75% recovery) was also similar in both groups: 15.4 (4.2) min in liver transplant patients and 12.8 (1.9) min in control patients (ns). After cisatracurium, peak laudanosine concentrations were 16 (5) and 21 (5) ng ml-1 in liver transplant and control patients, respectively. In summary, minor differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in liver transplant and control patients were not associated with any clinically significant differences in recovery profiles after a single dose of cisatracurium.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.