• Alexander M Fagenson, Elizabeth M Gleeson, Henry A Pitt, and Kwan N Lau.
• Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
• J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2020 Apr 1; 230 (4): 637-645.

BackgroundThe Albumin-Bilirubin score (ALBI) has been established to predict outcomes after hepatectomy. However, the relative value of ALBI and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) in predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure and mortality has not been adequately evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate and compare ALBI and MELD with respect to post-hepatectomy liver failure and mortality.Study DesignPatients undergoing major hepatectomy (≥3 segments) or partial hepatectomy (≤2 segments) were identified in the 2014 to 2017 American College of Surgeons NSQIP Procedure Targeted Participant Use File. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for 30-day post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and mortality. Predictive accuracy was assessed using a receiver operator characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC).ResultsFor 13,783 patients, median ALBI was -2.6, and median MELD score was 6.9. Severe PHLF (grade B to C) and mortality rates were 2.9% and 1.8%, respectively. Multivariable analyses revealed ALBI grade 2/3 to be a stronger predictor than MELD ≥10 with respect to severe PHLF (odds ratio [OR] 2.30; 95% CI, 1.95 to 2.73; p < 0.001 vs OR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.23; p = 0.99) and mortality (OR 3.35; 95% CI, 2.49 to 4.52; p < 0.001 vs OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.20; p < 0.001). ALBI also had better discrimination compared with MELD for severe PHLF (AUC 0.67 vs AUC 0.60) and mortality (AUC 0.70 vs AUC 0.58) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.ConclusionsALBI is a powerful predictor of PHLF and mortality. Compared with MELD, ALBI is more accurate, especially in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Copyright © 2020 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…