• Emerg Med Australas · Aug 2020

    Predictive values of haematuria and hydronephrosis in suspected renal colic: An emergency department retrospective audit.

    • Jarel Ts Saw, Nerissa Nexhmije Imeri, Emogene S Aldridge, and Paul G Buntine.
    • Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
    • Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Aug 1; 32 (4): 573-577.

    ObjectiveTo determine the predictive values of haematuria and hydronephrosis in suspected renal colic.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective audit of adult patients who received a computed tomography (CT) of the kidneys, ureter and bladder (CTKUB) for suspected renal colic, presenting to Eastern Health Emergency Departments in Melbourne, Australia, between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2016. CT hydronephrosis was used as a substitute for ultrasound hydronephrosis. We looked at the association of haematuria and CT proven hydronephrosis with CT proven ureteric and obstructing pelvic calculi.ResultsOf 769 adult cases who received a CTKUB for suspected renal colic, 384 were positive (49.9%) and 385 were negative (50.1%). For haematuria and renal colic, sensitivity was 87.3% (83.3-90.7), specificity 33.8% (28.9-39.0), positive predictive value (PPV) 55.7% (53.7-57.8), negative predictive value (NPV) 73.6% (67.1-79.3). For CT hydronephrosis and renal colic, sensitivity was 88.0% (84.2-91.1), specificity 85.0% (80.9-88.5), PPV 85.7% (82.4-88.5), NPV 87.4% (84.0-90.2). Of 110 cases with both negative CT hydronephrosis and negative haematuria, four had ureteric calculi, NPV 96.4% (90.8-98.6).ConclusionThis audit suggests that a diagnostic strategy relying on the absence of haematuria or hydronephrosis, or both, to rule out ureteric calculi may result in a small number of stones being missed.© 2020 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.