• Prehosp Emerg Care · Nov 2020

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of prehospital calculated age-adjusted pediatric shock index (SIPA) to those calculated in the ED for identifying trauma patients that needed the highest-level activation based on consensus criteria.

    • Geet Gandhi, Mary Kate Claiborne, Toni Gross, Bethany L Sussman, Katherine Davenport, and Blake Bulloch.
    • Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Nov 1; 24 (6): 778-782.

    AbstractBackground: The shock index (SI) is defined as the ratio of the heart rate to systolic blood pressure and a pediatric age-adjusted SI (SIPA) is more specific than the standard adult cutoff of 0.9 in identifying the sickest children presenting to a trauma center.Goal: To utilize prehospital vital signs to calculate the SIPA score and compare them to the SIPA calculated in the trauma bay to determine if they have the same validity in identifying critically ill children as determined by the consensus based standard criteria for trauma activation.Methods: Retrospective study using a cohort of patients transferred by EMS to a free standing, urban, level one, pediatric trauma center aged 1 to 16 years inclusive, and seen between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. Vital signs collected during the patch call from the EMS agency were used to calculate the EMS SIPA. The first set of vital signs collected in the trauma bay was used to calculate the ED SIPA. Patients were dichotomized to an elevated or non-elevated ED SIPA and an elevated or non-elevated EMS SIPA.Results: Our cohort consisted of 2651 patients. 546 (20.6%) patients had an elevated EMS SIPA and 438 (16.5%) had an elevated ED SIPA. When compared to their non-elevated counterparts, EMS and ED SIPA were both able to identify patients who met consensus criteria in all areas except the need for IR intervention, and unstable spinal fracture/spinal cord injury. For these criteria, the ED SIPA was better than the EMS SIPA. Sensitivity and specificity analysis reveal poor sensitivity for both measures but a high specificity for ED and EMS SIPA. Both SI and SIPA have a poor PPV but high NPV.Conclusions: This study utilized prehospital vital signs to calculate the SIPA score and compare them to the SIPA calculated in the trauma bay. Both scores had similar test metrics when based on the consensus based standard trauma criteria and could be utilized in the triage traumatic injuries.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…