• Deepa Rao, Seung W Choi, David Victorson, Rita Bode, Amy Peterman, Allen Heinemann, and David Cella.
• Center on Outcomes, Research and Education, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL, USA. deepa-rao@northwestern.edu
• Qual Life Res. 2009 Jun 1; 18 (5): 585-95.

PurposeMost measures of stigma are illness specific and do not allow for comparisons across conditions. As part of a study of health-related quality of life for people with neurological disorders, our team developed an instrument to assess the stigma for people with chronic illnesses.MethodsWe based item content on literature review, responses from focus groups, and cognitive interviews. We then administered the items to people with neurological disorders for psychometric testing.ResultsFive hundred eleven participants completed items of the stigma scale. Exploratory factor analysis produced two factors that were highly correlated (r = 0.81). Confirmatory factor analysis produced high standardized loadings on an overall stigma factor (0.68-0.94), with poorer loadings on the two sub-domains (-0.12 to 0.53). These results demonstrated a sufficiently unidimensional scale that corresponded with the bifactor model. Item response theory modeling suggested good model fit, and differential item functioning analyses indicated that the 24-item scale showed potential for measurement equivalence across conditions.ConclusionsOur efforts produced a stigma scale that had promising psychometric properties. Further study can provide additional information about the SSCI and its benefit in measuring the impact of stigma across conditions.

11 keywords...

hide…