• Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Jan 2000

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial

    Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT '91.

    • R D Kortmann, J Kühl, B Timmermann, U Mittler, C Urban, V Budach, E Richter, N Willich, M Flentje, F Berthold, I Slavc, J Wolff, C Meisner, O Wiestler, N Sörensen, M Warmuth-Metz, and M Bamberg.
    • Department of Radiotherapy, University of Tuebinen, Germany. RDKORTMA@MED.UNI-TUEBINGEN.DE
    • Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2000 Jan 15; 46 (2): 269-79.

    PurposeThe German Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (GPOH) conducted a randomized, prospective, multicenter trial (HIT '91) in order to improve the survival of children with medulloblastoma by using postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiation therapy as opposed to maintenance chemotherapy after immediate postoperative radiotherapy.Methods And MaterialsBetween 1991 and 1997, 158 patients were enrolled and 137 patients randomized. Seventy-two patients were allocated to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy (arm I, investigational). Chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide, etoposide, intravenous high-dose methotrexate, cisplatin, and cytarabine given in two cycles. In arm II (standard arm), 65 patients were assigned to receive immediate postoperative radiotherapy, with concomitant vincristine followed by 8 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin, CCNU, and vincristine ("Philadelphia protocol"). All patients received radiotherapy to the craniospinal axis (35.2 Gy total dose, 1.6 Gy fractionated dose / 5 times per week followed by a boost to posterior fossa with 20 Gy, 2.0 Gy fractionated dose).ResultsDuring chemotherapy Grade III/IV infections were predominant in arm I (40%). Peripheral neuropathy and ototoxicity were prevailing in arm II (37% and 34%, respectively). Dose modification was necessary in particular in arm II (63%). During radiotherapy acute toxicity was mild in the majority of patients and equally distributed in both arms. Myelosuppression led to a mean prolongation of treatment time of 11.5 days in arm I and 7.5 days in arm II, and interruptions in 35% of patients in arm I. Quality control of radiotherapy revealed correct treatment in more than 88% for dose prescription, more than 88% for coverage of target volume, and 98% for field matching. At a median follow-up of 30 months (range 1.4-62 months), the Kaplan-Meier estimates for relapse-free survival at 3 years for all randomized patients were 0.70+/-0.08; for patients with residual disease: 0.72+/-0.06; without residual disease: 0.68+/-0.09; M0: 0.72+/-0.04; M1: 0.65+/-0.12; and M2/3: 0.30+/-0.15. For all randomized patients without M2/3 disease: 0.65+/-0.05 (arm I) and 0.78+/-0.06 (arm II) (p < 0.03); patients between 3 and 5.9 years: 0.60+/-0.13 and 0.64+/-0.14, respectively, but patients between 6 and 18 years: 0.62+/-0.09 and 0.84+/-0.08, respectively (p < 0.03). In a univariate analysis the only negative prognostic factors were M2/3 disease (p < 0.002) and an age of less than 8 years (p < 0.03).ConclusionsMaintenance chemotherapy would seem to be more effective in low-risk medulloblastoma, especially in patients older than 6 years of age. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was accompanied by increased myelotoxicity of the subsequent radiotherapy, causing a higher rate of interruptions and an extended overall treatment time. Delayed and/or protracted radiotherapy may therefore have a negative impact on outcome. M2/3 disease was associated with a poor survival in both arms, suggesting the need for a more intensive treatment. Young age and M2/3 stage were negative prognostic factors in medulloblastoma, but residual or M1 disease was not, suggesting a new stratification system for risk subgroups. High quality of radiotherapy may be a major contributing factor for the overall outcome.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…