• Matthew J Weiss, Chelsea Kramer, Sébastien Tremblay, and Luc Côté.
• Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Centre Mère-Enfant Soleil du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, 2705 boul Laurier Local R1735, Québec, QC, G1V 4G2, Canada. matthew-john.weiss@mail.chudequebec.ca.
• Bmc Med Inform Decis. 2016 May 21; 16: 53.

BackgroundCognitive aids are increasingly recommended in clinical practice, yet little is known about the attitudes of physicians towards these tools.MethodsWe employed a qualitative, descriptive design to explore physician attitudes towards cognitive aids in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Semi-structured interviews elicited the opinions of a convenience sample of practicing PICU physicians towards the use of cognitive aids. We analyzed interview data for thematic content to examine the three factors of intention to use cognitive aids as defined by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), attitudes, social norms, and perceived control.ResultsAnalysis of 14 interviews suggested that in the PICU setting, cognitive aids are widely used. Discovered themes related to their use touched on all three TPB factors of intention and included: aids are perceived to improve team communication; aids may improve patient safety; aids may hinder clinician judgment; physicians may resist implementation if it occurs prior to demonstration of benefit; effective adoption requires cognitive aids to be integrated into local workplace culture; and implementation should take physician concerns into account.ConclusionsOur sample of PICU physicians were open to cognitive aids in their practice, as long as such aids preserve the primacy of clinical judgment, focus on team communication, demonstrate effectiveness through preliminary testing, and are designed and implemented with the local culture and work environment in mind. Future knowledge translation efforts to implement cognitive aids would benefit from consideration of these issues.

23 keywords...

hide…