• Jakob Wittenstein, Martin Scharffenberg, Anja Braune, Robert Huhle, Thomas Bluth, Moritz Herzog, Andreas Güldner, Lorenzo Ball, Francesca Simonassi, Ines Zeidler-Rentzsch, Vidal MeloMarcos FMFDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA., Thea Koch, RoccoPatricia R MPRMLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Paolo Pelosi, Jörg Kotzerke, Gama de AbreuMarceloMDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany., and Thomas Kiss.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary Engineering Group, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
• Br J Anaesth. 2020 Apr 1; 124 (4): 430439430-439.

BackgroundMechanical ventilation with variable tidal volumes (VT) may improve lung function and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, previous investigations were limited to less than 6 h, and control groups did not follow clinical standards. We hypothesised that 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable VT reduces pulmonary inflammation (as reflected by neutrophil infiltration), compared with standard protective, nonvariable ventilation.MethodsExperimental ARDS was induced in 14 anaesthetised pigs with saline lung lavage followed by injurious mechanical ventilation. Pigs (n=7 per group) were randomly assigned to using variable VT or nonvariable VT modes of mechanical ventilation for 24 h. In both groups, ventilator settings including positive end-expiratory pressure and oxygen inspiratory fraction were adjusted according to the ARDS Network protocol. Pulmonary inflammation (primary endpoint) and perfusion were assessed by positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose and 68Gallium (68Ga)-labelled microspheres, respectively. Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and haemodynamics were quantified. Lung aeration was determined using CT.ResultsThe specific global uptake rate of 18F-FDG increased to a similar extent regardless of mode of mechanical ventilation (median uptake for variable VT=0.016 min-1 [inter-quartile range, 0.012-0.029] compared with median uptake for nonvariable VT=0.037 min-1 [0.008-0.053]; P=0.406). Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, haemodynamics, and lung aeration and perfusion were similar in both variable and nonvariable VT ventilatory modes.ConclusionIn a porcine model of ARDS, 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable VT did not attenuate pulmonary inflammation compared with standard protective mechanical ventilation with nonvariable VT.Copyright © 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

5 keywords...

hide…