-
J Pain Symptom Manage · May 2020
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
- Junghee Yoon, Sung Hoon Sim, Danbee Kang, Gayeon Han, Youngha Kim, Jinseok Ahn, Dongryul Oh, Eun Sook Lee, Sun Young Kong, Juhee Cho, and Sandra A Mitchell.
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea; Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 May 1; 59 (5): 1082-1088.e6.
ContextTo improve precision and accuracy in the capture of symptomatic adverse events (AEs) by self-report, the U.S. National Cancer Institute has developed a library of 124 patient-reported outcome (PRO) items reflecting 78 symptomatic AEs drawn from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The PRO-CTCAE™ item library has been translated and linguistically validated in the Korean language.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of PRO-CTCAE-Korean.MethodsPRO-CTCAE-Korean and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) were administered to 1358 Korean-speaking individuals receiving treatment for cancer at two medical centers in Korea (mean age 55.1 years; SD ±11.9; 60% females; and 61% high school education or less). A subset of 82 study participants completed the same two measures on a second occasion approximately three days later.ResultsCorrelations between PRO-CTCAE-Korean and conceptually relevant QLQ-C30 items were all greater than r = 0.30 except for headache severity. Most PRO-CTCAE-Korean items correlated at least moderately with QLQ-C30 summary scores. Monotonically decreasing total QLQ-C30 scores were observed across worsening levels of symptom frequency, severity, and interference (all P < 0.01), indicating that PRO-CTCAE-Korean response choices are well comprehended, and that PRO-CTCAE-Korean discriminates respondents with different levels of symptom burden. PRO-CTCAE-Korean also demonstrated generally acceptable to good reliability (88% of items intraclass correlation coefficient >0.50).ConclusionPRO-CTCAE-Korean is a reliable and valid instrument to capture symptomatic AEs by self-report in patients on cancer clinical trials.Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.