-
- C Robertson, P Boyle, C C Hsieh, G J Macfarlane, and P Maisonneuve.
- Department of Statistics and Modelling Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
- Epidemiology. 1994 Mar 1; 5 (2): 164-70.
AbstractThis paper focuses on some statistical considerations in the estimation of dose-response in case-control studies when the exposure variables are continuous measurements. The first point is that the effects of differential variability in the exposure distributions over cases and controls cannot be differentiated from a true quadratic risk model. The second point is that when dealing with variables where zero denotes no exposure, it is important to treat the unexposed subjects separately from those who were exposed. Failure to do so can lead to differential variability among cases and controls and the resulting confounding with a quadratic risk model. Both of these points are illustrated by an example.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..