• Marielle C J L Klerks, Corry A J Ketelaars, and Paul B M Robben.
• Inspectorate for Youth Care, PO Box 483, 3500 AL Utrecht, The Netherlands. mc.klerks@inspectiejz.nl
• Health Policy. 2013 Aug 1; 111 (3): 311-9.

AbstractPoliticians and regulators have high expectations of unannounced inspections. Unannounced inspections, unlike announced ones, would, they believe, lead to a clearer insight into the risks and a reduction of the regulatory burden. In order to verify these assumptions, a systematic review of the scientific literature and an exploratory study were conducted. In the systematic review only three relevant articles were found concerned with research into the difference between unannounced and announced inspections. In the exploratory study, Dutch nursing homes were inspected, unannounced, and later announced, in order to compare the risks detected during the inspections. It is concluded that unannounced inspections did not reveal more or different risks, but provided a better insight into the quality of care delivered. Announced inspections are the best option for the assessment both of the organization and of its preconditions for good care. Evidence was found that an unannounced inspection leads to a reduction of the regulatory burden. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

8 keywords...

hide…