• European urology focus · Jul 2020

    Evaluation of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Prevention of Surgical Site Occurrences After Radical Cystectomy: A New Addition to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol.

    • Gregory A Joice, Giorgia Tema, Alice Semerjian, Mohit Gupta, Michael Bell, Joanne Walker, Max Kates, and Trinity J Bivalacqua.
    • The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. Electronic address: gjoice1@jhmi.edu.
    • Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Jul 15; 6 (4): 698-703.

    BackgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) remains a significant complication after radical cystectomy (RC). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) focuses on interventions to decrease length of stay, but few address wound-related complications directly.ObjectiveTo determine the impact that prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) will have to reduce the rate of surgical site occurrences (SSOs = SSI + seroma + superficial dehiscence) after RC.Design, Settings, And ParticipantsWe retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing RC by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2017. As part of our ERAS pathway, we employed prophylactic iNPWT during abdominal closure and compared it with a contemporary cohort of standard wound closure.Outcome Measurements And Statistical AnalysisWe compared 90-d SSIs, SSOs, and readmissions between iNPWT and standard skin staple closure. Univariate and multivariate regressions were used to compare the two groups.Results And LimitationsWe identified 158 (104 iNPWT, 54 standard) patients from 2012 to 2017. The rates of SSIs and SSOs were 9.7% and 19.0%, respectively. The overall readmission rate for the cohort was 21.5%, with 4.4% of patients requiring readmission for SSI. The iNPWT group had lower rates of SSIs (5.8% vs 16.7%, p = 0.03) and SSOs (11.5% vs 33.3%, p < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups for readmission (21.1% vs 22.2%, p = 0.5). The iNPWT protected against both SSI (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.98) and 90-d SSO (OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68-0.87).ConclusionsProphylactic iNPWT is feasible after RC with a modest decrease in both 90-d SSIs and 90-d SSOs, but not readmissions. Wound closure assisted by iNPWT should be considered in RC ERAS pathways.Patient SummaryIn this report, we looked at the impact of new vacuum suction dressing on the prevention of surgical infections after radical cystectomy (RC). We found that this wound dressing can decrease the impact of surgical infections and aid in recovery after RC.Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.