• Ioannis Gigis, Alexandros Nenopoulos, Dimitrios Giannekas, Roderich Heikenfeld, Theodoros Beslikas, and Ippokratis Hatzokos.
• 2 Orthopedic Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
• Open Orthop J. 2017 Jan 1; 11: 108-118.

BackgroundProximal humeral fractures in elderly patients present with severe comminution and osteoporotic bone quality. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has lately been proven beneficial in treating patients with complex proximal humeral fractures. The above technique is recommended and has better results in elderly than in younger individuals.MethodsWe performed a literature search in the databases Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for published articles between 1970 and 2016 using the terms: proximal humerus fractures and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.ResultsSignificant benefits with the use of reverse prosthesis, especially in patients older than 70 years with a proximal humeral fracture, include reduced rehabilitation time as well as conservation of a fixed fulcrum for deltoid action in case of rotator cuff failure. Compared with hemiarthroplasty and internal fixation, reverse prosthesis may be particularly useful and give superior outcomes in older patients, due to comminuted fractures in osteopenic bones. However, significant disadvantages of this technique are potential complications and a demanding learning curve.Therefore, trained surgeons should follow specific indications when applying the particular treatment of proximal humeral fractures and be familiar with the surgical technique.ConclusionAlthough long-term results and randomized studies for reverse prosthesis are lacking, short and mid- term outcomes have given promising results encouraging more shoulder surgeons to use this type of prosthesis in proximal humeral fractures.

7 keywords...

hide…